EVOLUTION

 

The evolution of the group? Complex and thorny question. Subject a little taboo because it is difficult for one person to judge in her(it) only, nine years of life extreme reactionary. How not to crease(offend) the opposite opinions which today are not any more in the group. Certainly the most delirious had stayed, to sacrifice themselves in the name of the group so that this one continuous still and always. And it is on that it is easier to go for glory in Nantes in a full stage(stadium) to be cracked(be failed) in Dl rather than in Le Mans in the stage(stadium) felix this D2. But the life of the MF passes by all These stages and could not continue without all these changes. Today the NIF evolved They have another image, what made at the beginning of the 90s can not make any more now. And conversely. We kept(guarded) I think This rebel and independent spirit without however plunging KB. Due to all we can praise to have a group powerful and respected in complete France. Europe also knows our reputation and nevertheless it has ever seen us. All right for the last point it is widely conceited but it is the truth, through miscellaneous mags European (super tifo, superhircha) or by means of the corresponding the MF was known everywhere in Europe (one says even that the Swedish young people tattoo ME on their right(straight) breast). But it does not prevent us from sleeping and we, proves that one not continued for anything. The evolution of the group is crossed(spent) by all these stages fear to arrive it(him) to is today. The foundations are solid. So solid that no person today can flow the group so unfortunately she(it) had to disappear of the scene extreme reactionary. This spirit of communication is so important that nobody also today can say which steers the MF. Hardly as we are known that a board of directors of five persons made to turn quite that and nevertheless! Everything those that pass in the premises or that are next(go alongside) what one can today call the hard pit knows that everybody bottom in the mass to form that one. One is well far from the personality cult. OK. Some are obliged well to take reins to advance the chmilbliq but it is always in mind of group. Moreover the small larousse not defined t iI not groups as a set(group) of gathered(reunited) persons. More than ever we got closer this year of this definition. And we invite all the persons having this mentality has to come to join us.